Aikens, Meters.T., A beneficial.E. Havens, and W.L. Flinn. 1975. Mimeograph. Dept. out-of Rural Sociology, Ohio County University, Columbus, Ohio. Alderman, H., and you can P. Hingis. 1992. As well as nutrients adequacy within the Ghana. Cornell As well as Nutrients Rules Paper no. 27. Boateng, Elizabeth.O., K. Ewusi, K. Kanbur, and you can A beneficial. Mckay. 1990 . An impoverishment reputation getting Ghana, 1987–88.. Social Dimensions of Improvement inside the Sub-Saharan Africa. The country Financial Performing Papers Zero. 5. Washington, D.C. CIMMYT Business economics Program. Farming Technology: Good Mexico. D.F: CIMMYT.
L. Rubinfield
Falusi, Good.O. 1974. Multivariate probit: Investigation out of picked situations influencing fertilizer adoption certainly producers during the West Nigeria. Nigerian Log out of Business economics and you may Personal Studies 16: 3–six. Feder, Grams. 1980. Farm size, chance aversion additionally the adoption of brand new technology less than suspicion. Oxford Financial Files 32: 263–295. Feder, G., and you may Roentgen. Slade. 1984. The acquisition of data and also the use of brand new tech. Western Journal off Agricultural Business economics –320. Feder, Grams., R.E. Just, and D. Zilberman. 1985. Use regarding agricultural innovations for the development regions: A study. Economic Invention and Cultural Alter –298. Fey, M. 1992. Domestic food use survey into the North Ghana. MSc. Thesis.College out-of Gottingen. Germany. Gerhart, J. 1975. The new diffusion from crossbreed maize inside West Kenya. CIMMYT, Mexico. Gerner, H., Elizabeth.O. Asante, Elizabeth. Owusu-Bennoah, and you can K. Marfo. 1995. Ghana fertilizer privatization design: Individual market opportunities and societal field obligations when you look at the conference means from producers. International Fertilizer Creativity Heart-Africa. Goldbeger, A.S. 1964. Econometric theory. John Wiley and you may Sons, Ny. Gyasi, K.O. 2001. Integration away from maize markets in the North Ghana. Pages 433–446 during the B. Badu -Apraku, Meters.An effective.B. Fakorede, M. Ouedraogo, and you can R.J. Casky (eds.) Perception, pressures and prospects out-of maize search inside the Western and Main Africa. Proceedings of a regional Maize Working area, 4–AN/IITA. Gyasi, K.O., L.Letter. Abatania, and you will P. Terbobri. 1999. Testing of one’s use of increased grain tech when you look at the North Ghana. SARI/EU-OFAR Technical Statement.
Ithaca, Ny: Cornell Food and Nutrients Investment
Hassan, Roentgen.M, and you may H. Faki. 1993. Economic policy and you may technology determinants of your comparative advantageous asset of grain development regarding Sudan . CIMMYT Financial Paper No. 6. Morris, Yards.L, R. Tripp, and you may A.An effective. Dankyi. 1999. Use and impression off enhanced maize design tech: A case study of Grain Creativity Enterprise. CIMMYT Economics Program Paper 99–01. Kebede, Y., K. Gunjal, and you will Grams. Coffin. 1990. Use of brand new technology inside Ethiopian agriculture: The scenario from TeguletBulga Section, Shoa State. Agricultural Economics cuatro: 1. MoFA (Ministry out of Food and Agriculture). 1997. Accelerated agricultural development and growth in support of attention 2020. Write. MoFA. 1998. (Ministry off As well as Farming). Farming inside Ghana: Situations and numbers. PPMED, Accra, Ghana. NAES (Nyankpala Agricultural Try out Station). , , , 1988, 1989. Annual Accounts, Nyankpla, Tamale, Ghana. Nowak, P.J. 1987. The adoption away from farming preservation development: Monetary and you can diffusion explanations. Outlying Sociology 52(2): 208–220. Panin, A good., 1988. Hoe and you can bullock farming possibilities from inside the north Ghana. A relative socio-financial data. Nyankpala Agricultural Lookup Statement No. 1. Pindyck, Roentgen.S. and you will D. 1998. Econometric mo dels and you will monetary forecasts. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, United states of america. Ralm, Meters.Roentgen., and you can W.Elizabeth. Huffman. 1984. The fresh new use from faster tillage: The fresh character of people financial support or any other parameters. American Journal out of Agricultural Business economics 66: 405–415. Shakya, P.B., and J.C. Flinn. 1985. Use of contemporary variety and you may fertilizer fool around with to your grain regarding the Eastern Tarai of Nepal. Log off Farming Economics thirty-six(3).
Appendix A good: Empirical model? ? Following the Shakya and you may Flinn (1985), the latest empirical design because of it analysis try specified the following: Y* = ? + ? X + ? and you may Y = g(Y*) where Y=Y* to possess Y* > 0 Y = 0, if you don’t
Y* try a collection reflecting the fresh new mix effect of X (character particular and you will technology certain) circumstances one dictate adoption decision. Y* we s maybe not observable. What exactly is, but not, observed is if brand new farmer adopts the technology (when Y* >0) or not ( whenever Y* =0). In which Y is the town (ha) less than improved maize variety, X is really as defined over, ? envie d’application de rencontre Women’s Choice , ? is actually parameters as estimated and you may ? are good stochastic mistake name The possibilities of adoption and use power would be estimated by using the following the conditional presumption form: E(Y|Y*) = Y*.F(Y*/?) + ? .f(Y*/?
Leave a reply